State Crackdown on Anti-Corporate Dissent: The Animal Rights Movement

£1.00 / Free Download / 22 pages / July 2009

Civil liberties are under threat in the UK. Successive governments are introducing an increasing amount of repressive pieces of legislation which curtail the rights of the individual.

This new legislation has been, and will be, used to protect corporations against dissenting voices.

The Attack on the Animal Rights Movement

The state and the police force, primarily the National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit (NETCU), have been waging a media war against the animal rights movement. This media smokescreen helps to prevent the mobilisation

of public opinion in solidarity with campaigners targeted with repressive legislation.

The project analyses the way in which these new laws put the interests of business over and above individuals rights to freedom of expression and assembly. Over the years animal rights campaigners have begun to seriously challenge companies involved in animal research. The state has developed

new branches of the police force (ARNI and NETCU) to deal with this challenge to corporate power. Measures have been taken to prop up companies who are facing dissent, including the passing of legislation allowing companies to opt out of publishing data and the granting of Bank of England facilities to Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS).

The Corporate Individual

This work follows on from our work on corporate law. In 2004 Corporate Watch published the 'Corporate Law and Structures' report. This report critically examined the way in which corporations had developed rights in law. Today the law provides companies with protection originally intended

for human beings yet frees them from many of the liabilities individuals face. Corporate Watch's planned research will examine the development of the 'corporate person' in criminal and civil law and its relation to the crackdown on campaigners. For example, the Protection from Harassment Act has developed the concept that a company can be 'harassed'.

Related Articles:

Protecting power: Police press ahead with political prosecution of 26 of the Ratcliffe 114

Animal Rights activist convicted as CPS stretch definition of blackmail

Sean Kirtley freed after sixteen months in prison

National Domestic Extremism Team issues bail conditions designed to prevent protest

Netcu: Seriously Organised?

Corporate Injunction Experts

How the state protects corporations from dissent: Jailed SHAC activists receive indefinite ASBOs

State repression of Anti-Corporate Dissent: Animal right activists convicted of 'conspiracy to blackmail'

ITT director
granted confidentiality after receiving a polite letter

Whose agenda do reports of 'eco-terrorism' serve?


Pharmaceutical Industry Profiles