Sainsbury’s Company Profile

Sainsbury’s is one of the UK’s biggest retailers and present in towns, cities and retail parks across the UK. It has been criticised for its links with government and related promotion of genetic engineering, excessive transportation of products, promoting intensive farming, paying producers low prices, and undermining small businesses.

You can find Corporate Watch articles on Sainsbury’s and our 2002 company profile below.

Click here for Sainsbury’s head office and other basic information from the opencorporates website.

Click here for details of Sainsbury’s latest profits and other financial results from the Bloomberg website.

There is also lots of useful information on Sainsbury’s website:

  • Click here to find out the types of business the company is involved in.

  • Click here to find out who’s on Sainsbury’s board of directors.

  • Click here to download Sainsbury’s latest annual report and accounts.

If you want to do some digging into Sainsbury’s yourself, have a look at our Investigating Companies: A Do-It-Yourself Handbook.

If you would like your website added to this list, or have any other links or suggestions for this page, please get in touch.

J Sainsbury Plc: Who, Where, How Much?

J Sainsbury plc,

Holborn Place,

33 Holborn,

London EC1N 2HT

Tel: 0207 695 6000

Company Structure/ Ownership:

Share Value:

Judith Portrait, Sainsbury’s solicitors, holds a blind trust for Lord Sainsbury of Turville, as well as other settlements. At the end of May 2001 the total holding of these trusts amounted to 28 per cent of the Company’s share capital[10]. According to the directors’ report of 2001, “Christopher Stone, Andrew Cahn and John Rosenheim are trustees of various settlements, including charitable settlements. As at 29 May 2001 the total holdings of the trusts of which the above are trustees amounted to 5 per cent, 5 per cent and 3 per cent respectively.” Christopher Stone is Chief Executive of Diatech, the biotechnology company of which Lord Sainsbury of Turville owns a large proportion.

The report continues: “As at 29 May 2001 the interests, beneficially and as trustees of charitable and other trusts of Lord Sainsbury of Preston Candover KG, the Hon. Simon Sainsbury and the Rt. Hon. Sir Timothy Sainsbury were 4 per cent, 3 per cent and 3 per cent respectively. All the above include duplications. Franklin Resources Inc. has a notifiable interest of 3 per cent.”[11] Franklin Resources Inc.’s web page can be found at:

Annual Turnover: Sales for 2000 were £18 441 000 000, including VAT and US Sales Tax[12].

Back to top

Company Officers:



Sir George Bull, Non-Executive Chairman
Previously Chairman of Diageo plc, until 1998; Former Group Chief Executive of Grand Metropolitan plc, Non-Executive Director of BNP Paribas UK and the Maersk Company Ltd. Vice President of the Marketing Council.

Sir Peter Davis, CEO, Group Chief Executive
Previous Group Chief Executive in Prudential plc from 1995-2000, chief executive and then chairman of Reed International from 1986-94. Chairman of Business in the Community, chairman of the Welfare to Work New Deal task Force, founder member of the Marketing Council.

Roger Matthews, Group Fin. Director
Formerly group managing director and finance director of Compass Group PLC

Sir Clive Thompson, Non-Executive Director
Chief Executive of Rentokil Initial plc. Non-Executive Director of Kleeneze PLC. Former President and current deputy president of the CBI, Vice President of the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Deputy Chairman of the Financial Reporting Council.

Keith Butler-Wheelhouse, Non-Executive Director
Chief Executive of Smiths Industries plc, President of SAAB Automobile Sweden until 1996. On the Delta (MBO of General Motors South Africa) Board as a Non-Executive Director.

Ian Coull, Group Property and Environmental Affairs Director
Director, J Sainsbury Pension Trustees. He is a fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. He is a member of the Scottish Valuation and Rating Council. He is a member of the Government’s Property Industry Forum and Chairman of the South Bank Employers’ Group.

John Adshead, Group Human Resources and Information Systems Director
Chairman, J Sainsbury Pension Trustees. Non-Executive Director of the Tablet Publishing Company.

Robin Whitbread, Retail Director, Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd.
Director of Sainsbury’s Bank plc. Non-Executive Director, Shaw’s Supermarkets Inc from 1987-2000.

June de Moller, Non-Executive Director
Director of Carlton Communications from 1983-1999, Managing Director from 1993. Non-Executive Director, British Telecommunications plc, Lynx Group plc and the Cookson Group plc.

Jamie Dundas, Non-Executive Director
Chief Executive of MEPC Limited. Finance Director of Hong Kong Airport Authority 1992-96. Director of Macmillan Cancer Relief.

Lord Levene of Portsoken, Non-Executive Director
Vice Chairman of Deutsche Bank AG London, Chairman of International Finance and a Director of the Haymarket Group. Lord Mayor of London 1998-99[14].

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets, Shaw’s, Sainsbury’s Bank, J Sainsbury Developments, Sainsbury’s Property Co.

Joint Ventures:
In October 2001 Sainsbury’s launched a venture with ScottishPower[15] to supply Sainsbury’s customers with electricity. The scheme is currently being piloted in six stores.

In July 2001, the two groups unveiled a joint venture in which Boots would take over the health-and-beauty aisles in six Sainsbury’s out-of-town superstores, with the first due early in 2002[16].

In September 2001, Sainsbury’s signed an energy management contract with Enron to reduce energy consumption by 12 per cent. [Sainsbury’s Signs Energy Management Contract with Enron to Reduce Energy Consumption by 12 per cent, 19 September 2001[17]. In the light of Enron’s demise it is unclear what will happen to this venture.

Back to top

[12] J Sainsbury PLC Annual Report and Financial Statement 2001, p.1

[14] J Sainsbury PLC Annual Report and Financial Statement 2001, p. 16/17

[16] Mail on Sunday, 16th September 2001
[17] Sainsbury’s Signs Energy Management Contract with Enron to Reduce Energy Consumption by 12 per cent, 19 September 2001

J Sainsbury Plc: Products and Projects


J Sainsbury PLC’s operations include Sainsbury’s Supermarkets, Sainsbury’s Bank, JS Developments, Sainsbury’s Property Company and the US Shaw’s Supermarkets[6], of which Sainsbury’s Supermarkets are by far the largest, bringing £510 000 000 operating profit in the year to 2001[7].

40% of the products in Sainsbury’s supermarkets are own-brand[8]. In November 2001 Sainsbury’s announced that it is to launch an own-brand range of Fair Trade goods, [26 November 2001 ‘Major boost for Fairtrade Movement – Sainsbury’s announces plans for an own label range’,[9] which is welcome news indeed, but should not disguise the fact that Sainsbury’s, along with all other supermarkets, is still failing to ensure than an adequate price is paid to farmers across the world, thus creating a lot more poverty than it relieves.

References [6] [7] J Sainsbury PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2001, p. 2

[8] [9] 26 November 2001 ‘Major boost for Fairtrade Movement – Sainsbury’s announces plans for an own label range’,

J Sainsbury PLC: Response to the Palestinian call for a boycott of Israeli goods

Like it’s competitor Tesco, Sainsbury’s has previously sold produce the supermarket knew was from illegal West Bank settlements. Around 2008 activists took photographs of Sainsbury’s SO Organic and Taste the Difference Medjool dates clearly labeled ‘Grown in – West Bank’ and grown by the Jordan Valley settlements of Netiv Hagdud and Masua. In 2009 the SO Organic packaging was changed to simply say ‘Origin –West Bank’ with no mention of whether they were grown in a settlement or not. In 2016, SO Organic Medjool dates sold on the Sainsbury’s website are labeled as a product of either the US or Israel and in light of DEFRA guidelines on the labeling of produce from the West Bank it would appear the company has stopped sourcing these dates from settlements.


Whilst it is not clear which company Sainsbury’s currently source their Mejdool dates from the supermarket has previously been linked with Israeli date-grower cooperative Hadiklaim (known for their mislabeling of settlement produce). Sainsbury’s source their white and red grapefruits from Mehadrin – as do ASDA and Waitrose – and labels on the boxes suggest these are packaged in Mehadrin’s packinghouses in the Israeli towns of Netivot and Beit Shean in the southern and northern parts of the country respectively. The Israeli company is a major supplier to the UK supermarket chain.1 Other Israeli produce sold by Sainsbury’s include: bell peppers, avocados and figs.


To read more about the movement for a boycott if Israel see


To read more about the campaign to peruade Sainsburys not to stock Israeli goods see


1 Sainsbury’s Supermarket Pressured to Boycott Israel, Electronic Intifada 2014. Available from:

J Sainsbury Plc: Corporate Crimes

Promoting GM Food

(See also Influence section)

Since Lord Sainsbury of Turville’s departure, J Sainsbury PLC has steered well clear of promoting GM crops in its own name, but with Lord Sainsbury’s and Christopher Stone of Diatech’s large shareholdings in the company, money spent at Sainsbury’s is still likely to support biotechnology, whether through funding research through the Gatsby Trust, or through investments in Diatech and Innotech (which are backed by Lord Sainsbury), or through the large donations which Lord Sainsbury has given to the Labour party, (which certainly appear to have brought Lord Sainsbury rewards in the shape of a peerage and an appointment as Science and Technology Minister, and in turn have promoted his agenda.)

According to the Guardian, Lord Sainsbury owns, though his ownership of Diatech, a biotechnology patent, and[39] in the December 1997 Register of Lords’ Interests, before he was made a minister, he declared that he was a ‘holder of licensed plant biotechnology patent’. However, Lord Sainsbury has denied the Guardian’s allegation that the patent is the cauliflower mosaic promoter, which was at the centre of the Arpad Pusztai affair[40].

Christopher Stone owns 5% stake in Sainsburys (see Shareholder section) and is also the Chief Executive of Diatech. Money spent in Sainsburys stores is also enriching this man and his support for biotechnology.

Lord Sainsbury has also lent his support to the extremely controversial cloning of human embryo cells for gene therapy[41].

Back to top

Undue Influence On Government

(See also Influence section for information on Lord Sainsbury of Turville)

In July 1997 John Prescott overruled Richmond council’s objection to a huge out-of-town Sainsbury store. Tony Blair denied it had anything to do with Lord Sainsbury’s £2 million donation to the Labour party[42].

Destroying Small Farmers

The price which farmers receive for their produce frequently fails to cover the cost of production, and consequently only farmers which produce on a very large scale and can therefore produce more cheaply can afford to carry on this way. For others, spiralling debt has become the norm and has forced many out of business. Despite the general culture of isolation and despair in farming, several protests have taken place against supermarkets. It is difficult to be precise about the scale of the problems encountered by suppliers in their dealings with supermarkets because farmers are too afraid to lose their contracts to speak openly. John Breach of the Fruit Growers’ Association described the risk of being de-listed for raising objections to terms and conditions as ‘very real’.[43]

Many of the criticisms levelled at supermarkets by suppliers do not specify which is involved, because of a fear of losing contracts.

As the government’s Competition Commission found, many suppliers will not talk about their experiences, nor even fill in questionnaires. The Commission’s report is available at:

Supermarkets claim that they cannot set prices because they buy from processors not directly from farmers, and therefore pay market prices, which not allowed to be fixed. This, on one hand, is a result of World Trade Organisation policy, and shows how unfair these rules are towards small producers who are not allowed to systematically receive a fair price for their products. On the other hand, Sainsbury’s can take part in fairly trading tea and coffee, so there is no reason why it could not introduce lines of fairly traded farm products. As a company at the top of the supply chain, Sainsbury’s could, if it believed in a fair price, instigate a fair trade system for farm products.

Another favourite argument is that the price paid by retailers is not the most important issue, rather that farmers are suffering from the high rate of exchange of the pound, which gives them relatively less subsidy money. This is also a favourite argument of the National Farmers Union, but it is really quite peripheral. The reason why farmers need so much subsidy money in the first place is because they have been paid less and less for their produce over the years. Consumers should pay an honest price which covers the costs of the producers, and then subsidies would not be needed, since subsidies are a symptom of processors and retailers offloading costs onto taxpayers. It should be noted that so-called ‘free’ trade is not an answer to this because it is basically the same as we have now, except without the cushion of subsidies, and it results in a race to the bottom for standards and prices, which means only the largest can survive.

Sainsbury’s cannot be the saviour of British farming because it cannot deal on a human scale. It can only achieve apparently cheap prices through dealing in bulk and this excludes small producers. Supermarkets do sometimes begin to deal with small producers, but only with a view to making them larger and more ‘economical’ to deal with.

Back to top

Causing Climate Change

Like every other supermarket, Sainsbury’s transports it goods far further than necessary because it can only deal in bulk and profits from economies of scale if it has only a few distribution depots. Even if food is produced near to the shop where it is bought, it will at least have been driven to a regional distribution centre and back, and probably further if it has been processed or packaged. Sainsbury’s is kind enough to show us how much CO2 its supermarkets emit at:
and its transport at:

It has made improvements in its transport but its supermarkets have diminished the effect of this. Sainsbury’s Environmental Report 2000 claims that the chain had reduced its transport by 3.27 million kilometres per year since 1997, which does indeed sound impressive, but it makes one wonder how many kilometres they were doing in the first place and why?[44]

Back to top

Having An Unhealthily Long food Chain

In December 2001, the Guardian alleged that Sainsbury’s had been selling chicken breasts with altered “use-by” dates. The supermarket chain said that the chicken breasts were no longer on sale and it was shocked by the Guardian’s findings. It has launched an inquiry. Following allegations by a worker at one of Sainsbury’s suppliers, the Guardian investigated the giant Lloyd Maunder poultry plant in Devon – which supplies 20% of all Sainsbury’s fresh chicken, and found:

  • Replacement use-by labels being applied, adding an extra 48 hours to the shelf life given by the previous processor
  • “Portioned” chicken being brought in from a Wolverhampton firm, GMB, which sources some of its meat from Europe (although the chicken in question was labelled as British Farm Standard) and is not approved by Sainsbury’s asa supplier.

Sainsbury’s says the food labelling regulations have not been breached: “The use-by dates on the packs are not use-by dates as defined in the regulations.” The Guardian observed GMB use-by dates of November 25 on vacuum packs of chicken breasts – six days after they had been killed. When they arrived at the Lloyd Maunder factory, they were repackaged with new labels carrying use-by dates of November 27. This brought the chilled chicken up to the maximum age permitted by Sainsbury’s – eight days old.

Sainsbury’s says it can trace all its chicken back to approved and inspected slaughterhouses, but the Guardian’s evidence showed that in the case of the chicken breasts sold as part of a “buy one, get one free offer”, it did not know that a sub-supplier was involved.

Andrew Maunder, a director of Lloyd Maunder, said chicken from GMB Meats had been repacked for Sainsbury’s but that it was meat originally sold to GMB by Lloyd Maunder. “It is our understanding that the product supplied to Sainsbury’s is not only British but from our own source”. Lloyd Maunder had reassured Sainsbury’s that outside suppliers were only used to help with this one-off promotion[45].

Even if no regulations were actually broken, this sorry tale tells us a lot about the strange way we cart our food around before we eat it.

Back to top

Effects On Communities

The appearance of a new Sainsbury’s store has much the same effect on communities as with other supermarkets: People are seduced by having everything under one roof, usually with cheap and convenient parking nearby, and begin to desert smaller traders, thus causing the decline of high streets, and resulting unemployment. Much more on this topic can be found at:

Brighton residents are currently trying to stop Sainsbury’s building a store on the railway station goods yard site (more information, and a proposed new store is also meeting opposition in Westbury on Trym, where there are at least 7 supermarkets within approximately four miles already, including a Wal Mart. [See forthcoming Corporate Watch briefing Checkout Chuckout].

Sainsburys and Tesco “have been fiercely criticised by the Citizen Organising Foundation for charging higher prices in poor areas than rich ones[46].” This disgraceful strategy seems to rely on the poor being more of a captive market then the wealthy and rather exposes all the concern supermarkets periodically show for their less well-off customers when they defend marketing strategies such as loss-leaders.

Back to top

Cutting Health And Safety Corners

In 1998 an inquest jury found that Maurice Disney, a forklift truck driver for Sainsbury’s, had been unlawfully killed in an accident at work. A safety switch on his forklift had been disconnected and it went out of control and crushed him. An independent engineer told the inquest that the accident would never have happened if the truck had been properly maintained. Sainsbury’s admitted the safety breaches and were fined £425,000[47].

Aiding Animal Abuse

According to the Financial Times, Lord Sainsbury was involved in pressing the Royal Bank of Scotland to prolong a Pounds 22.6m loan to Huntingdon Life Sciences in a last ditch attempt to save the drug-testing company threatened with receivership. Lord Sainsbury spoke twice to senior Royal Bank executives and is thought to have stressed the damage that would be done to its reputation, especially with other pharmaceutical companies, if it refused to delay[48].

According to Uncaged, the Pharmaceutical Industry Competitiveness Task Force (PICTF) was set up following a meeting in November 1999 between the Prime Minister and the CEOs of Astra Zeneca, Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham. Lord Sainsbury chaired the working group that discussed how to weaken vivisection regulations[49].

Proposals by Cambridge University to build a multimillion pound primate research centre near the village of Girton, north of Cambridge, were unanimously rejected by the local authority, but in a letter written by Lord Sainsbury, and seen by The Observer, the Minister has given full backing to the project, which he describes as ‘nationally important'[50].

Back to top

Revealed: Lord Sainsbury’s interest in key gene patent. The Guardian, 16 Feb 1999

[40] BBC News, 16th February 1999,
[41] The Daily Express, 4th October 1999.

[42] Monbiot, George, Captive State, MacMillan, 2000, p.199-200

[43] George Monbiot, Captive State, Macmillan, 2000 p.184

[44] J Sainsbury plc, Environmental Report 2000, p. 10

[45] Dates altered on chicken sold at Sainsbury’s, The Guardian, Thursday December 6, 2001

[46] George Monbiot, Captive State, MacMillan, 2000, p.186

[47] Confederation of British Wool Textiles, Health and Safety News, Issue No. 23, January 2000,
[48] Move to save drug-test group. Financial Times, 17th January 2001
[50] Fury Over Green Belt Lab. The Observer, Sunday 4th November 2001

J Sainsbury Plc: Influence / Lobbying


Sainsbury’s has a great deal of influence in the areas of government and research, chiefly due to its assocation with Lord Sainsbury of Turville, who was chairman of the company until he was made Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Science and Innovation in 1998. It may be objected that he is no longer formally a part of the Sainsbury company but he is the largest shareholder, so he benefits directly from consumers spending their money in Sainsbury’s, and since he left Sainsbury’s only when he entered government, his links with the company are still extremely strong.

Lobbying Groups:

Sir Clive Thompson is current deputy president and former president of the Confederation of British Industry[18], which is the British arm of UNICE, (the Union of Industry and Employers Federations of Europe)[19]. Interestingly, UNICE has been picked out by Corporate Europe Observatory for its lobbying against binding agreements on carbon emissions, (see: which sits somewhat uncomfortably with Sainsburys’ professed concern about the subject. (see Corporate Crimes) For more on UNICE, see:

Back to top

Research and Education:

Much of the controversy surrounding Sainsburys’ connection with education is the family’s contribution to genetic engineering research. Lord Sainsbury of Turville contributes through his Gatsby trust, which is supposed to be a blind trust but since his funding and ownership are public knowledge, one assumes that he might have some idea what he contributes to as well.

Lord Sainsbury of Turville:
According to Friends of the Earth, the Gatsby Trust gives £ 2 million per year to the Sainsbury Laboratory based at the John Innes Centre, Norwich, which deals with molecular plant pathology and genetics. (Its web page is at:[20].

It also produces some of the most vocal supporters of GM crops in Britain: Phil Dale and Jonathan Jones, more information about whom can be found on the excellent Norfolk Genetic Information Network website at The Daily Mail has alleged that though he does not attend meetings or make decisions, Lord Sainsbury retains the power to appoint and dismiss trustees of the Gatsby Trust. If he has chosen well he would not need to go to the meetings to ensure his views are adhered to[21]…

According to Friends of the Earth, since 1998 the Sainsbury Laboratory has also received 6 Government grants, worth £1.1 million, from the Biotechnology and Biological Research Council (BBSRC). The BBSRC is part of the Government Office of Science and Technology, which answers to Sainsbury as Science Minister and has won an extra £50 million in funding since he became Minister[22].

Lord Sainsbury of Turville has also made a substantial contribution to the controversial Said Business School, Oxford. His contribution is apparently the second largest after arms-broker Wafic Said’s donation. Lord Sainsbury is also an honorary fellow of Worcester College, which has also benefited substantially from him[23]. The Said Business School is an intensely controversial project which has attracted criticism from arms trade campaigners, human rights campaigners, trainspotters, architecture buffs, anti-roads, anti-corporate and anti-privatisation campaigners, along with other local residents who just feel that it is an eyesore. For more on the school, see:

Back to top

Lord Sainsbury of Preston Candover:
Lord Sainsbury of Preston Candover has also established the John Sainsbury Scholarship for postgraduate studies at University of Cape Town[24]. He, along with his brothers The Hon. Simon Sainsbury and Sir Timothy Sainsbury, also gave a large donation to the National Gallery for its extension, the Sainsbury wing[25]. The idea of national cultural institutions being funded by money from businessmen is contentious: Many believe that art should be free of purchased influence. The idea of people who profit from Sainsburys giving money to appear as generous benefactors to the nation may also grate with those who recall the damage that Sainsburys, along with other large retailers, have wrought on livelihoods and heritage both in rural areas and town centres.

J Sainsbury PLC:
The Chair in Horticulture at the Imperial College at Wye is supported by a charitable donation from Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd. Sainsbury’s and Wye College have collaborated for nearly ten years on fresh produce science, research and development[26]. £65,000 was also donated to WellBeing to fund a nutrition and pregnancy research project being undertaken by St Mary’s Hospital, London[27]. This might be regarded as a positive gesture, but money given by industry has the potential to steer research, no matter how unintentionally, towards the needs of large food producers and away from small-scale, sustainable production.

Sainsbury’s also has Sainsbury’s School Rewards – a points redemption promotion to help schools obtain free school equipment. Research shows that customers who have registered for the scheme spend more than customers who have not registered[28], though this could be because people who spend little money rarely bother to register for such schemes.

Sainsburys has also launched Taste of Success – an initiative relating to food education in schools. Its key elements are: the Food Award Scheme (for pupils 9-14 years old), an on-line Food Product Development Case Studies (for pupils studying food technology) and Teacher Training Sessions[29]. The website is a good resource for anyone wishing to see how much our food is mucked around with before we buy it, but is sadly reflective of the current style of food technology education in schools: There are flow diagrams-a-plenty of product development and food processing, but no actual cooking.

Back to top

Links with Government:

Sir Peter Davis is chairman of the New Deal Task Force[30].

Ian Coull is a member of the Property Industry Forum[31].

Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Sainsbury’s truly blurs the line between influencing the government and being the government. Lord (David) Sainsbury of Turville is Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Science and Innovation, and is responsible for the Office of Science and Technology, design, Innovation Policy, the Chemicals and Biotechnology industries, the British National Space Centre and the National Weights and Measures Laboratory

He was a member of the IPPR Commission on Public Policy and British Business from 1995 to 1997[32].

Lord Sainsbury is a shining example of all that is wrong with mixing business and government. George Monbiot, in his Fat Cats Directory, points out the following:


  • On one hand he was Chairman of J Sainsbury PLC, one of the supermarket chains subject to the Competition Commission report into alleged anti-competitive practices. On the other, as a minister in the Department of Trade and Industry, which regulates competition policy, the Competition Commission reports to his Department.
  • On one hand he was Chairman of the Food Chain Group, representing food retailing interests in the government’s Foresight Programme. On the other, he is now in overall charge of the government’s Foresight Programme as Minister for Science and Technology.
  • On one hand, he is principal backer of the biotechnology company Diatech. On the other, as Science Minister, he led a US-bound delegation of the BioIndustry Association lobby group, which represents Diatech, among other companies. The DTI paid some of the group’s costs.
  • On one hand he funded the construction of the Sainsbury laboratory at the John Innes Centre in Norwich, which carries out genetic engineering, and on the other, he has ultimate control of the BBSRC, a government funding body which helps to finance the Sainsbury laboratory, as well as a large proportion of biological and biotechnology research in institutions across Britain.
  • On one hand, as head of J Sainsbury, he was criticized for undermining skilled jobs in the independent retailing sector and replacing them with unskilled and unfulfilling shelf-stacking and checkout jobs. On the other, he is head of the University for Industry, whose purpose is supposedly to boost young people’s skills[33].

Back to top

There are a number of further irregularities in Lord Sainsbury of Turville’s involvement with GM crops. As Science Minister, he is in charge of promoting biotechnology at the Department of Trade and Industry, but as a member of the Cabinet Biotechnology Committee he has been given responsibility for national policy on biotechnology, which he is clearly not keen to delay in any way. He insists that he leaves the room when GM crops are discussed, because of his financial interests in the food industry[34]. However, controversy reared its head yet again when it emerged that he had met three officials from Monsanto in his private office on the eve of a key seminar with environmentalists. The Department of Trade and Industry confirmed the meeting had taken place but insisted that GM foods had not been the main point of the discussions[35]. As George Monbiot points out, whether his financial interests in GM are able to influence government policy directly is not the only problem. More basic is the problem of having people used to running business claiming to run a democracy, the principles of which are completely opposed to those of business, which concentrate only on enriching a small minority of people: Shareholders[36].

On an even more conspicuous level, Lord Sainsbury of Turville has given £6 million to the Labour Party in the last two years alone, and had previously given two other large donations[37].

Many have pointed to the conflict of interests between being both a large donor to the Labour party and a Minister, and point to the apparent buying of influence. It would indeed be interesting to see what would happen in the event of any incident in which the Labour party was called upon to sack him – Would they dismiss such a vital funder?

PR Companies:


Back to top

[21] [Daily Mail, 9th February 1999]

[33] George Monbiot, Captive State, p. 210

[34] BBC News, 16th February 1999,
[35] Daily Mail, 3rd August 1999,,

[36] The Guardian, 30th September 1999,,4273,3907519,00.html
[38] ‘Hollis UK Press & public Relations Annual’ 2000-2001 (32nd edition)

Further Links, Contacts and Resources

The Guardian, 30th September 1999,,4273,3907519,00.html

The Competition Commission Report is available online at:

George Monbiot, Captive State, MacMillan, 2000.

For information on groups opposing new Sainsbury’s stores, see forthcoming Corporate Watch Briefing ‘Checkout Chuckout’.